{"id":118147,"date":"2023-10-24T15:00:02","date_gmt":"2023-10-24T20:00:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/news.olemiss.edu\/?p=118147"},"modified":"2023-10-24T15:01:00","modified_gmt":"2023-10-24T20:01:00","slug":"when-is-a-public-officials-social-media-private-scotus-to-decide","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/web20.olemiss.edu\/news\/wordpress\/when-is-a-public-officials-social-media-private-scotus-to-decide\/","title":{"rendered":"When is a Public Official&#8217;s Social Media Private? SCOTUS to Decide"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"margin-top: 0in;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/web20.olemiss.edu\/news\/wordpress\/when-is-a-public-officials-social-media-private-scotus-to-decide\/ucimg-2853\/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-118153\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-shareaholic-thumbnail wp-image-118153\" src=\"http:\/\/web20.olemiss.edu\/news\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/UCIMG-2853-640x359.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"600\" height=\"337\" srcset=\"https:\/\/web20.olemiss.edu\/news\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/UCIMG-2853-640x359.jpg 640w, https:\/\/web20.olemiss.edu\/news\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/UCIMG-2853-300x168.jpg 300w, https:\/\/web20.olemiss.edu\/news\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/UCIMG-2853-2048x1147.jpg 2048w, https:\/\/web20.olemiss.edu\/news\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/UCIMG-2853-768x430.jpg 768w, https:\/\/web20.olemiss.edu\/news\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/UCIMG-2853-1536x860.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/web20.olemiss.edu\/news\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/UCIMG-2853-580x326.jpg 580w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a>OXFORD, Miss. \u2013 The U.S. Supreme Court will take up two cases Tuesday (Oct. 31) to answer a new question regarding Americans&#8217; First Amendment rights: Can elected officials block their constituents on social media?<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-top: 0in;\"><span data-contrast=\"auto\">The issue at hand is whether the elected officials in <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/DocketPDF\/22\/22-611\/250069\/20221229135151254_LINDKE%20Petition.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">Lindke v. Freed<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"auto\"> and <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/DocketPDF\/22\/22-324\/242374\/20221004114559258_Garnier%20v.%20OConnor-Ratcliff%20-%20Cert%20Petition.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">O&#8217;Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"auto\"> were acting as public servants or merel<\/span><span data-contrast=\"auto\">y <\/span><span data-contrast=\"auto\">as themselves in their online presences, said Chris Green, <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/olemiss.edu\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">University of Mississippi<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"auto\"> law professor and Jamie L. Whitten Chair of Law and Government. <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-top: 0in;\"><span data-contrast=\"auto\">&#8220;There are a bunch of fascinating issues about the boundary of the state,&#8221; Green said. &#8220;Where does the government official end and people&#8217;s private lives begin?&#8221;&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-top: 0in;\"><span data-contrast=\"auto\">In Lindke v. Freed, a city manager in Port Huron, Michigan, blocked a resident and <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.jurist.org\/news\/2023\/04\/us-supreme-court-to-hear-two-cases-about-public-officials-blocking-other-users-on-social-media\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">deleted their critical comments from his Facebook page<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"auto\">. The 6<\/span><span data-contrast=\"auto\">th<\/span><span data-contrast=\"auto\"> Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that did not violate the resident&#8217;s First Amendment rights. <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-top: 0in;\"><span data-contrast=\"auto\">However, in O&#8217;Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier, the 9<\/span><span data-contrast=\"auto\">th<\/span><span data-contrast=\"auto\"> Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that two California school board members may have violated First Amendment rights when they blocked two parents after they posted critical comments. <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-top: 0in;\"><span data-contrast=\"auto\">It is the difference of circuit court opinion between the two similar cases that brought this issue to the Supreme Court, Green said. <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-top: 0in;\"><span data-contrast=\"auto\">&#8220;Because they took both cases, (the Supreme Court isn&#8217;t) likely to reverse both of them, but it is possible they could come up with a third way to solve this,&#8221; the <a href=\"https:\/\/law.olemiss.edu\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Ole Miss law<\/a> professor said. &#8220;It&#8217;s the kind of problem you&#8217;ve had for centuries, where you have individual people with more than one hat. <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-top: 0in;\">&#8220;Here, it&#8217;s just very, very easy to manufacture a new hat.&#8221;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-top: 0in;\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">The cases bear resemblance to a <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nbcnews.com\/politics\/supreme-court\/supreme-court-dismisses-lawsuit-over-trump-s-twitter-account-n1263030\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">lawsuit regarding former U.S. President Donald Trump&#8217;s social media account<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"none\">, where the president had blocked several people who criticized him. The Supreme Court tossed that suit, though it had succeeded in lower courts, on the basis that Trump was no longer president. <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-top: 0in;\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">The primary concern of the upcoming cases is determining whether the city manager and school board members were acting in their public official roles on their social media accounts, Green said. <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-top: 0in;\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">The school board members created personal, public Facebook and X, formerly known as Twitter, <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sandiegouniontribune.com\/pomerado-news\/news\/story\/2023-04-25\/supreme-court-poway-social-media-officials\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">accounts before they were elected that they used for campaign purposes, to address public issues and for official business<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"none\">. <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-top: 0in;\"><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Freed made his Facebook page while in college and used it primarily for personal reasons, though he did post public news and official business after he became city manager, court documents said. When <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/DocketPDF\/22\/22-611\/250069\/20221229135151254_LINDKE%20Petition.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">he hit the 5,000 &#8220;friend&#8221; limit on Facebook, he converted his profile to a page,<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"auto\"> which cannot be made private. <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-top: 0in;\"><span data-contrast=\"auto\">&#8220;If they&#8217;re wearing a governmental hat, there are a bunch of rules they need to have about treating everybody equally,&#8221; Green said. &#8220;They can&#8217;t just say, &#8216;You&#8217;re being annoying. I&#8217;ll block you on Facebook.&#8217;&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-top: 0in;\"><span data-contrast=\"auto\">&#8220;I<\/span><span data-contrast=\"none\">f you&#8217;re acting as a government officer, mere annoyance isn&#8217;t enough. You have to behave even-handedly because of the First Amendment.&#8221; <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-top: 0in;\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">Still, it is unlikely that the Supreme Court will make a blanket ruling that all social media pages of public officials are inherently places of government business, Green said. <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-top: 0in;\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">&#8220;The Supreme Court isn&#8217;t going to adopt a rule that says, &#8216;When in doubt, you&#8217;re acting as the government,'&#8221; he said. &#8220;But it&#8217;s hard to tell what they will do, because it&#8217;s such a new issue.&#8221; <\/span><\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>OXFORD, Miss. \u2013 The U.S. Supreme Court will take up two cases Tuesday (Oct. 31) to answer a new question regarding Americans&#8217; First Amendment rights: Can elected officials block their constituents on social media? The issue at hand is whether the elected officials in Lindke v. Freed and O&#8217;Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier were acting as public<a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/web20.olemiss.edu\/news\/wordpress\/when-is-a-public-officials-social-media-private-scotus-to-decide\/\" rel=\"nofollow\">Read the story &#x2026;<\/a><!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":101,"featured_media":118154,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[199,193],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v15.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>When is a Public Official&#039;s Social Media Private? SCOTUS to Decide - Ole Miss News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/news.olemiss.edu\/when-is-a-public-officials-social-media-private-scotus-to-decide\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"When is a Public Official&#039;s Social Media Private? SCOTUS to Decide - Ole Miss News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"OXFORD, Miss. \u2013 The U.S. Supreme Court will take up two cases Tuesday (Oct. 31) to answer a new question regarding Americans&#8217; First Amendment rights: Can elected officials block their constituents on social media? The issue at hand is whether the elected officials in Lindke v. Freed and O&#8217;Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier were acting as publicRead the story &#x2026;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"http:\/\/news.olemiss.edu\/when-is-a-public-officials-social-media-private-scotus-to-decide\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ole Miss News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-10-24T20:00:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-10-24T20:01:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/web20.olemiss.edu\/news\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/UCIMG-2853a.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"200\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@OleMissRebels\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@OleMissRebels\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/web20.olemiss.edu\/news\/wordpress\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/web20.olemiss.edu\/news\/wordpress\/\",\"name\":\"Ole Miss News\",\"description\":\"The official source for University of Mississippi news\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":\"https:\/\/web20.olemiss.edu\/news\/wordpress\/?s={search_term_string}\",\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/news.olemiss.edu\/when-is-a-public-officials-social-media-private-scotus-to-decide\/#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/web20.olemiss.edu\/news\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/UCIMG-2853a.jpg\",\"width\":200,\"height\":200,\"caption\":\"Chris Green\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/news.olemiss.edu\/when-is-a-public-officials-social-media-private-scotus-to-decide\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/news.olemiss.edu\/when-is-a-public-officials-social-media-private-scotus-to-decide\/\",\"name\":\"When is a Public Official's Social Media Private? SCOTUS to Decide - Ole Miss News\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/web20.olemiss.edu\/news\/wordpress\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/news.olemiss.edu\/when-is-a-public-officials-social-media-private-scotus-to-decide\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-10-24T20:00:02+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-10-24T20:01:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/web20.olemiss.edu\/news\/wordpress\/#\/schema\/person\/e39e7b8a10a45c4dbbc35ef2cf22bebf\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/news.olemiss.edu\/when-is-a-public-officials-social-media-private-scotus-to-decide\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/web20.olemiss.edu\/news\/wordpress\/#\/schema\/person\/e39e7b8a10a45c4dbbc35ef2cf22bebf\",\"name\":\"Clara Turnage\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/web20.olemiss.edu\/news\/wordpress\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/2.gravatar.com\/avatar\/eb5303762f202e75edd53080f7a85dc6?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Clara Turnage\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/web20.olemiss.edu\/news\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118147"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/web20.olemiss.edu\/news\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/web20.olemiss.edu\/news\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web20.olemiss.edu\/news\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/101"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web20.olemiss.edu\/news\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=118147"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/web20.olemiss.edu\/news\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118147\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":118160,"href":"https:\/\/web20.olemiss.edu\/news\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118147\/revisions\/118160"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web20.olemiss.edu\/news\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/118154"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/web20.olemiss.edu\/news\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=118147"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web20.olemiss.edu\/news\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=118147"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web20.olemiss.edu\/news\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=118147"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}